Data Analysis: Conduct and describe appropriate statistical analysis of the data /20
MGT723 Research Proposal Final Report Marking Rubric
The breakdown of the marks and plan is as follows.
(Note: the marks allocated are not indicative of the proportion of total words):
• Data Analysis: Conduct and describe appropriate statistical analysis of the data /20
• Hypothesis Testing: Draw appropriate conclusions regarding the hypothesis based on the inferential data analysis. /10
• Discussion: convincingly and clearly discuss the implications for practice and theory /30
• Limitations: Clearly identify the limitations of the study. /10
• Further Research: Identify opportunities for further research based on the findings, and limitations, of your study. /10
• Spelling, Grammar and Referencing: Correct and consistent referencing and flawless spelling and grammar /10
• Referencing: correct and consistent intext referencing and Bibliography. /10
Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Excellent
Literature Summary Provide your one-page literature summary model from Task 1. Update if necessary
Conceptual Model Provide your one-page conceptual model from Task 1. Update if necessary
Hypotheses Provide your hypotheses – update if necessary
Descriptive Statistics Provide your descriptive statistics from Task 1. Update if necessary.
Data Analysis Statistical analysis is missing or inappropriate 0-9 Appropriate inferential statistical analysis is conducted, including further analysis
10-15 Appropriate and sufficient inferential statistical analysis is conducted without error.
Insightful further analysis
16-20
Hypothesis Testing Hypothesis testing is missing or incorrect 0-3 Hypothesis testing is conducted but there are some errors 4-6 Appropriate conclusions regarding the hypotheses based on the inferential statistics 7-10
Discussion
Incomplete, vague or erroneous discussion 0-14 Discussion clearly follows from the data analysis 15-22 Clear and insightful discussion of the results and how they contribute to existing theory. Appropriate further analysis. 23-30
Limitations Limitation missing or poorly communicated 0-3 Limitations identified and clearly communicated 4-6 Insightful limitations based on the research design 7-10
Further Research No opportunities for further research identified 0-3 Opportunities for further research identified but not clearly communicated 4-6 Insightful opportunities for further research based on the literature and results convincingly communicated 7-10
Spelling and Grammar Many mistakes, difficult to understand 0-3 Few mistakes, easy to understand 4-6 No mistakes, clear and convincing expression 7-10
Referencing Numerous inconsistencies in referencing 0-3 Mostly correct and consistent referencing
4-6 Correct and consistent referencing
7-10
Plagiarism Failure to use quotation marks when using someone else’s words. Academic penalties, including failing the task, the course, and potentially exclusion from the university
The breakdown of the marks and plan is as follows.
(Note: the marks allocated are not indicative of the proportion of total words):
• Data Analysis: Conduct and describe appropriate statistical analysis of the data /20
• Hypothesis Testing: Draw appropriate conclusions regarding the hypothesis based on the inferential data analysis. /10
• Discussion: convincingly and clearly discuss the implications for practice and theory /30
• Limitations: Clearly identify the limitations of the study. /10
• Further Research: Identify opportunities for further research based on the findings, and limitations, of your study. /10
• Spelling, Grammar and Referencing: Correct and consistent referencing and flawless spelling and grammar /10
• Referencing: correct and consistent intext referencing and Bibliography. /10
Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Excellent
Literature Summary Provide your one-page literature summary model from Task 1. Update if necessary
Conceptual Model Provide your one-page conceptual model from Task 1. Update if necessary
Hypotheses Provide your hypotheses – update if necessary
Descriptive Statistics Provide your descriptive statistics from Task 1. Update if necessary.
Data Analysis Statistical analysis is missing or inappropriate 0-9 Appropriate inferential statistical analysis is conducted, including further analysis
10-15 Appropriate and sufficient inferential statistical analysis is conducted without error.
Insightful further analysis
16-20
Hypothesis Testing Hypothesis testing is missing or incorrect 0-3 Hypothesis testing is conducted but there are some errors 4-6 Appropriate conclusions regarding the hypotheses based on the inferential statistics 7-10
Discussion
Incomplete, vague or erroneous discussion 0-14 Discussion clearly follows from the data analysis 15-22 Clear and insightful discussion of the results and how they contribute to existing theory. Appropriate further analysis. 23-30
Limitations Limitation missing or poorly communicated 0-3 Limitations identified and clearly communicated 4-6 Insightful limitations based on the research design 7-10
Further Research No opportunities for further research identified 0-3 Opportunities for further research identified but not clearly communicated 4-6 Insightful opportunities for further research based on the literature and results convincingly communicated 7-10
Spelling and Grammar Many mistakes, difficult to understand 0-3 Few mistakes, easy to understand 4-6 No mistakes, clear and convincing expression 7-10
Referencing Numerous inconsistencies in referencing 0-3 Mostly correct and consistent referencing
4-6 Correct and consistent referencing
7-10
Plagiarism Failure to use quotation marks when using someone else’s words. Academic penalties, including failing the task, the course, and potentially exclusion from the university
Comments
Post a Comment