RESEARCH WRITING CENTER AT PrimeWritersBay.com

  Appendix II – Marking Criteria for Assessment 3 Criteria 0-2.5 Marks 2.5-5 Marks 5-7.5 Marks 7.5-10 Marks Total Definition of clinical leadership Insufficient explanation of clinical leadership and/or does not reference relative literature. Sound discussion of clinical leadership. Includes definition & description, could have been improved. Good discussion of clinical leadership including definition, description and attributes. Relevance could have been stronger. Exemplary discussion of clinical leadership including definition, description and attributes. Excellent use of theoretical concepts to support discussion which were well supported by evidence. …./10 Moral courage Poorly describes moral courage in the context of clinical leadership and/or does not reference relative literature Sound description of moral courage and clinical leadership. Some areas could be improved. Good description of moral courage and clinical leadership Good use of theoretical concepts to support discus

  Context Assessment Purpose: The purpose of this assignment is for students to work collaboratively, either in pairs or in teams, to explore key issues in the field of professional sport, mental health, and community engagement. proposing the creation of a sports mental health foundation, advocating for programs / initiatives, for professional sporting bodies, to support and engage with. The report is designed to develop students’ research, communication, and advocacy skills as well, as to deepen students’ understanding of the sport, mental health strategies, and advocacy. Instructions Assessment Details According to Liddle, Dean & Vella (2017), emotional wellbeing and resilience, with regards to stress, embody what we consider mental health to be. For mentally healthy individuals, coping with daily stresses and fully participating in family, work, sport, leisure, and community activities highlight a stable and resilient individual. However, for those individuals who have been dia

  Answer all the questions. Submission Time: 9:30 pm on Canvas portal only. Make sure to upload before time. No email submissions will be accepted or marked. Your submission must pass through Turn-it-in software on Canvas. Do not send question or cover sheet. Problem 1: Show that the mean time to failure of a parallel system of n identical components, each with an exponential time to failure with mean 1/?, is 1/?(1+1/2+1/3+?+1/n). (8 points) Problem 2). A pump/filter system supplies clean fluid to a production process. The system consists of two subsystems in parallel (S1 and S2), to increase reliability. Each subsystem consists of one pump and a filtering element in series. S1 has one filter as the filtering element. The filtering element of S2 has two filters in parallel. Failure rate of each pump is 1.5 per year (failure time exponentially distributed), and of each filter, 2.5 per year (exponentially distributed), when they operate. a). Draw the reliability block diagram of the pump

  SS IGNMENT 4 LAW 2002 Subject Code and Name LAW2002 Introduction to Income Tax Law Assessment Assessment 4 Individual Assignment Individual/Group Individual Length 2500 words equivalent Learning Outcomes This assessment addresses the following subject learning outcomes: a) Explain the Code of Conduct established under the TASA 2009 b) Interpret and apply selected sections of the ITAA 36 and ITAA97 covering ordinary and statutory income, general and specific deductions and the taxation of entities and their associates c) Formulate a piece of written advice for a client about the tax implications of their residency status and business activities with reference to applicable case law and legislation d) Compare and contrast the tax outcomes for the sole trader, partnership, trust and company structures, including the tax outcomes for associated entities e) Analyse and apply tax legislation to authentic scenarios Submission By 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday of Week 10 Weighting 20% Total Marks